January/February 2020
The Impact of Protein Quality on Muscle Recovery Sarcopenia, the progressive loss of muscle mass with age, is associated with increased risks for falls, fractures, hospitalization, poor mobility, and disability.1 It’s been estimated that sarcopenia-related complications were responsible for $18.5 billion in health care costs in 2004.2 In the United States and Canada, older adults are one of the fastest-growing populations, making sarcopenia an important public health concern.3 Sarcopenia is measurable at approximately the fifth decade of life, with losses in muscle proceeding at a rate of 0.8% per year and losses in strength slightly more precipitous at roughly 2% to 5% per year.4,5 These losses, however, are not linear and can be accelerated by periods of marked reductions in physical activity (eg, bed rest, limb immobilization) from which older adults (>60 years), as compared with younger adults, have a difficult time recovering due in part to declines in sensitivity to anabolic stimuli.6 Anabolic resistance, the term used to describe the attenuated response of skeletal muscle to anabolic stimuli (eg, protein ingestion or resistance exercise), may be a key determinant in the progression of sarcopenia in the elderly. For instance, for a given bout of resistance exercise, older adults require a three times greater volume of exercise than do younger adults to achieve a similar anabolic response.7 Additionally, older adults require a postexercise protein dose that is greater (0.4 g/kg) than those younger adults require (0.24 g/kg) to maximally stimulate muscle protein synthesis (rate of muscle growth).8 For example, a 75-kg young adult would require an 18-g dose of protein compared with a 30-g dose required by an older adult of the same mass in order to overcome anabolic resistance. Thus, there’s undoubtedly substantial difficulty for older adults to take measures to overcome anabolic resistance to maintain skeletal muscle with age. Meeting Proposed Protein Requirements With Supplements A possible solution may be the use of protein supplementation to achieve recommended elevated protein intakes. It’s important, however, to consider that protein sources are not all of equal quality. Therefore, it’s necessary to be mindful about the selection of protein source when recommending a supplement, particularly for older adults for whom increasing dietary protein is already a challenge. Ideally, the supplement should be high quality, meaning that it’s a complete protein (ie, it contains all essential amino acids) and is easy to digest and absorb. Another important factor to consider when recommending a protein supplement is its leucine content. Leucine, an essential amino acid, is the only known amino acid to independently stimulate a muscle building response in healthy individuals; therefore, when consuming a protein with low leucine content, individuals may require a greater absolute or total amount of protein to achieve a maximal rate of muscle protein synthesis.15 Whey protein is one of the highest-quality proteins, according to the protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS),16 the official method to determine protein quality, as well as a newly proposed method for the determination of protein quality by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS).17 Additionally, whey protein has the highest leucine content of the available protein supplements and is rapidly digestible, meaning that amino acids become readily and quickly available in the blood. Aging and the Cycle of Disuse Moreover, during periods of recovery from illness or surgery, older adults typically consume fewer calories, especially those from protein, resulting in weight loss, of which roughly 25% can be lost as muscle mass.23 Results have also shown that a hypocaloric state induces a significant reduction in rates of muscle protein synthesis, resulting in the loss of skeletal muscle.13 Furthermore, a previous study has shown that a drastic reduction in physical activity in the form of an 85% reduction in daily steps resulted in decreased rates of muscle protein synthesis and development of insulin resistance that were not recovered with a two-week monitoring period during which participants returned to habitual levels of physical activity.22 No study to date had examined the effects of any nutritional intervention on losses in muscle mass or muscle protein synthesis in response to abruptly reduced daily stepping in any population. Thus, to address this scientific question, a study published recently in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition was designed to better understand how the combination of physical inactivity, energy restriction, and protein supplementation and quality would affect skeletal muscle mass and function in healthy older adults. The main objective was to determine how elevated protein intake through the ingestion of a high-quality protein supplement (ie, whey protein) or a low-quality protein supplement might affect the loss of skeletal muscle and aid in recovery upon return to habitual activity.24 During Inactivity, Does Protein Quality Matter? Following the two weeks of step reduction and hypocaloric diet, participants resumed habitual levels of physical activity for one week and were provided with calories to maintain energy balance but were still at an elevated protein intake, as part of a “recovery” phase. The increased protein intake from weeks two to five was achieved through twice-daily supplementation with either 30 g of whey protein or 30 g of collagen peptides. Collagen peptides were chosen as the comparator protein because they are an incomplete protein (lacking the essential amino acid tryptophan), rendering them a low-quality protein with a PDCAAS and DIAAS score of 0. (Any protein lacking an essential amino acid is considered incomplete and cannot be ranked as part of protein quality scores.) Importantly, collagen peptides have substantially less (68% less) leucine than does whey protein. Furthermore, collagen peptides are marketed toward older adults as a supplement meant to increase skeletal muscle mass; however, there’s little to no molecular evidence to underpin its efficacy.25-27 Conversely, whey protein has been shown to robustly stimulate rates of muscle building in both younger28 and older29,30 participants and to preserve muscle loss during periods of energy restriction.31 As hypothesized, fat- and bone-free mass (FBFM), as evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, was reduced following two weeks of reduced daily stepping in combination with energy restriction in both groups, regardless of supplement type. Upon resumption of physical activity, both groups regained FBFM, but the whey protein–supplemented group regained a greater amount of lean tissue. Researchers found that consumption of an energy-restricted diet resulted in reductions in rates of muscle protein synthesis that were not further exacerbated by the two weeks of step reduction. Furthermore, after participants returned to habitual physical activity, whey protein facilitated an increase in rates of muscle protein synthesis, while rates in the collagen peptides group remained attenuated. Previous literature32,33 has shown that, despite ingestion of a whey protein supplement during single leg immobilization or consumption of essential amino acids during bed rest,26 individuals lose skeletal muscle with disuse. The findings from the current study showing that skeletal muscle was lost despite consumption of a high-protein, supplemented diet corroborate that nutrition alone may not protect against inactivity-induced losses in muscle mass. To date, only neuromuscular stimulation and resistance exercise have shown promise in the ability to offset the loss of skeletal muscle during bed rest and step reduction, though future research is required in order to determine optimal strategies for the offset of muscle loss with disuse.34-36 These results highlight that, regardless of elevated protein intake and protein quality, a severe reduction in physical activity is a potent catabolic stimulus despite that participants were not confined to bed rest. Additionally, results demonstrate that energy restriction and step reduction do not act synergistically to alter skeletal muscle loss and point to a potential theoretical threshold at which healthy older adults are able to mitigate catabolism such that consecutive catabolic stimuli do not impact muscle protein synthesis additively. Lastly, it appears as though the role of protein quality may be increasingly important during rehabilitation or convalescence from illness given the augmentation of muscle protein synthesis in the current study with whey protein; therefore, interventions should focus on nutrition during postoperative recovery or following acute illness, as protein supplementation has been shown to increase muscle mass in combination with resistance exercise in older adults.37 Few studies have examined protein supplementation during rehabilitation, but previous studies have shown that protein supplementation increased knee extensor strength in patients following a hip fracture38 and increased knee extensor strength and distal vastus laterialis muscle mass in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament injuries.39 Improving patient outcomes following acute disuse is a multifactorial effort. Ultimately, limiting periods of disuse and encouraging physical activity are key to regulating the pace of sarcopenia and the maintenance of skeletal muscle mass and function. Skeletal muscle losses and alterations in muscle protein synthesis from the present study should be taken into consideration given the population analyzed (ie, healthy older adults free of chronic conditions and living independently) and the disuse model invoked (step reduction as opposed to bed rest) as improvements in FBFM and rates of muscle protein synthesis may not be as robust in compromised populations or those who are frail at the onset of disuse. Whey Protein: A Solution to Meet the Protein Nutritional Needs for the Geriatric Population As this article demonstrates, whey protein is one of the highest quality proteins with the highest leucine content. It’s rapidly digestible and is found naturally in dairy. Because of its functionality as a protein supplement, whey protein easily can be incorporated into different foods and beverages and therefore could be used to increase protein intake in different circumstances/needs older adults face. The nutritional characteristics of whey protein position it as the protein supplement with potential unique benefits for older adults—to maintain muscle health and allow them to function in situations such as recovery after acute hospitalization.24 In conclusion, the scientific information provided herein suggests that the dramatic loss of muscle mass and strength by older people may be efficiently treated by including a high-quality protein, such as whey protein, as part of nutrition strategies to reduce the burden of sarcopenia-related issues associated with acute hospitalization. — Sara Y. Oikawa, MSc, is a PhD candidate in the department of kinesiology in the Exercise Metabolism Research Group at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. — Moises Torres-Gonzalez, PhD, is chair of the Scientific Sub-Committee of the Whey Protein Research Consortium and director of nutrition research at the National Dairy Council in Rosemont, Illinois.
References 2. Janssen I, Shepard DS, Katzmarzyk PT, Roubenoff R. The healthcare costs of sarcopenia in the United States. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(1):80-85. 3. McDevitt TM, Rowe PM; US Census Bureau. The United States in international context: 2000. https://usa.ipums.org/usa/resources/voliii/pubdocs/2000/c2kbr01-11.pdf. Published February 2002. 4. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Ross R. Low relative skeletal muscle mass (sarcopenia) in older persons is associated with functional impairment and physical disability. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(5):889-896. 5. Paddon-Jones D, Short KR, Campbell WW, Volpi E, Wolfe RR. Role of dietary protein in the sarcopenia of aging. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(5):1562S-1566S. 6. Suetta C, Hvid LG, Justesen L, et al. Effects of aging on human skeletal muscle after immobilization and retraining. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2009;107(4):1172-1180. 7. Kumar V, Atherton PJ, Selby A, et al. Muscle protein synthetic responses to exercise: effects of age, volume, and intensity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012;67(11):1170-1177. 8. Moore DR, Churchward-Venne TA, Witard O, et al. Protein ingestion to stimulate myofibrillar protein synthesis requires greater relative protein intakes in healthy older versus younger men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015;70(1):57-62. 9. Krok-Schoen JL, Archdeacon Price A, Luo M, Kelly OJ, Taylor CA. Low dietary protein intakes and associated dietary patterns and functional limitations in an aging population: a NHANES analysis. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(4):338-347. 10. Bauer J, Biolo G, Cederholm T, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people: a position paper from the PROT-AGE Study Group. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(8):542-559. 11. Deutz NE, Bauer JM, Barazzoni R, et al. Protein intake and exercise for optimal muscle function with aging: recommendations from the ESPEN Expert Group. Clin Nutr. 2014;33(6):929-936. 12. Tieland M, Borgonjen-Van den Berg KJ, Van Loon LJ, de Groot LC. Dietary protein intake in Dutch elderly people: a focus on protein sources. Nutrients. 2015;7(12):9697-9706. 13. Murphy CH, Oikawa SY, Phillips SM. Dietary protein to maintain muscle mass in aging: a case for per-meal protein recommendations. J Frailty Aging. 2016;5(1):49-58. 14. Murphy CH, Churchward-Venne TA, Mitchell CJ, et al. Hypoenergetic diet-induced reductions in myofibrillar protein synthesis are restored with resistance training and balanced daily protein ingestion in older men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2015;308(9):E734-E743. 15. Katsanos CS, Kobayashi H, Sheffield-Moore M, Aarsland A, Wolfe RR. A high proportion of leucine is required for optimal stimulation of the rate of muscle protein synthesis by essential amino acids in the elderly. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006;291(1):E381-E387. 16. Phillips SM. Current concepts and unresolved questions in dietary protein requirements and supplements in adults. Front Nutr. 2017;4:13. 17. Phillips SM. The impact of protein quality on the promotion of resistance exercise-induced changes in muscle mass. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2016;13:64. 18. Goodpaster BH, Park SW, Harris TB, et al. The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: the health, aging and body composition study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(10):1059-1064. 19. Katzmarzyk PT, Janssen I. The economic costs associated with physical inactivity and obesity in Canada: an update. Can J Appl Physiol. 2004;29(1):90-115. 20. Covinsky KE, Palmer RM, Fortinsky RH, et al. Loss of independence in activities of daily living in older adults hospitalized with medical illnesses: increased vulnerability with age. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(4):451-458. 21. Breen L, Stokes KA, Churchward-Venne TA, et al. Two weeks of reduced activity decreases leg lean mass and induces “anabolic resistance” of myofibrillar protein synthesis in healthy elderly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(6):2604-2612. 22. McGlory C, von Allmen MT, Stokes T, et al. Failed recovery of glycemic control and myofibrillar protein synthesis with two weeks of physical inactivity in overweight, pre-diabetic older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;73(8):1070-1077. 23. Leidy HJ, Carnell NS, Mattes RD, Campbell WW. Higher protein intake preserves lean mass and satiety with weight loss in pre-obese and obese women. Obesity. 2007;15(1):421-429. 24. Oikawa SY, McGlory C, D’Souza LK, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of protein supplementation on leg lean mass and integrated muscle protein synthesis during inactivity and energy restriction in older persons. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;108(5):1060-1068. 25. Zdzieblik D, Oesser S, Baumstark MW, Gollhofer A, König D. Collagen peptide supplementation in combination with resistance training improves body composition and increases muscle strength in elderly sarcopenic men: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2015;114(8):1237-1245. 26. Jendricke P, Centner C, Zdzieblik D, Gollhofer A, König D. Specific collagen peptides in combination with resistance training improve body composition and regional muscle strength in premenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. Nutrients. 2019;11(4):892. 27. Phillips SM, Tipton KD, Van Loon LJ, Verdijk LB, Paddon-Jones D, Close GL. Exceptional body composition changes attributed to collagen peptide supplementation and resistance training in older sarcopenic men. Br J Nutr. 2016;116(3):569-570. 28. Churchward‐Venne TA, Burd NA, Mitchell CJ, et al. Supplementation of a suboptimal protein dose with leucine or essential amino acids: effects on myofibrillar protein synthesis at rest and following resistance exercise in men. J Physiol. 2012;590(11):2751-2765. 29. Yang Y, Breen L, Burd NA, et al. Resistance exercise enhances myofibrillar protein synthesis with graded intakes of whey protein in older men. Br J Nutr. 2012;108(10):1780-1788. 30. Devries MC, McGlory C, Bolster DR, et al. Leucine, not total protein, content of a supplement is the primary determinant of muscle protein anabolic responses in healthy older women. J Nutr. 2018;148(7):1088-1095. 31. Hector AJ, Marcotte GR, Churchward-Venne TA, et al. Whey protein supplementation preserves postprandial myofibrillar protein synthesis during short-term energy restriction in overweight and obese adults. J Nutr. 2014;145(1):246-252. 32. Dirks ML, Wall BT, Nilwik R, Weerts DH, Verdijk LB, van Loon LJ. Skeletal muscle disuse atrophy is not attenuated by dietary protein supplementation in healthy older men. J Nutr. 2014;144(8):1196-1203. 33. Ferrando AA, Paddon-Jones D, Hays NP, et al. EAA supplementation to increase nitrogen intake improves muscle function during bed rest in the elderly. Clin Nutr. 2010;29(1):18-23. 34. Dirks ML, Hansen D, Van Assche A, Dendale P, Van Loon LJ. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation prevents muscle wasting in critically ill comatose patients. Clin Sci (Lond). 2015;128(6):357-365. 35. Dirks ML, Wall BT, Snijders T, Ottenbros CL, Verdijk LB, van Loon LJ. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation prevents muscle disuse atrophy during leg immobilization in humans. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2014;210(3):628-641. 36. Devries MC, Breen L, Von Allmen M, et al. Low‐load resistance training during step‐reduction attenuates declines in muscle mass and strength and enhances anabolic sensitivity in older men. Physiol Rep. 2015;3(8). 37. Bauer JM, Verlaan S, Bautmans I, et al. Effects of a vitamin D and leucine-enriched whey protein nutritional supplement on measures of sarcopenia in older adults, the PROVIDE study: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(9):740-747. 38. Niitsu M, Ichinose D, Hirooka T, et al. Effects of combination of whey protein intake and rehabilitation on muscle strength and daily movements in patients with hip fracture in the early postoperative period. Clin Nutr. 2016;35(4):943-949. 39. Holm L, Esmarck B, Mizuno M, et al. The effect of protein and carbohydrate supplementation on strength training outcome of rehabilitation in ACL patients. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(11):2114-2123. 40. Winograd CH, Lindenberger EC, Chavez CM, Mauricio MP, Shi H, Bloch DA. Identifying hospitalized older patients at varying risk for physical performance decline: a new approach. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45(5):604-609. 41. Boyd CM, Landefeld CS, Counsell SR, et al. Recovery of activities of daily living in older adults after hospitalization for acute medical illness. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(12):2171-2179. 42. Bohannon RW. Mortality and readmission of the elderly one year after hospitalization for pneumonia. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2004;16(1):22-25. 43. Fisher SR, Kuo YF, Sharma G, et al. Mobility after hospital discharge as a marker for 30-day readmission. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68(7):805-810. |