January/February 2024
Mental Health: Treatment-Resistant Depression Major depressive disorder affects one in five individuals and is the leading cause of disability worldwide.1 Antidepressants are first-line treatment for adults with moderate to severe depression, with about 70% of persons achieving complete remission.2 However, at least 30% of people fail to respond adequately, even after several months and numerous treatment attempts. Those who do not achieve an adequate response to two separate antidepressant medications are considered to have treatment-resistant depression (TRD)—or difficult to treat depression. TRD can be devastating to patients and contributes to increased morbidity and challenges with functional and social activities while also increasing mortality from all causes, including a greater risk of suicide. TRD treatment is challenging and typically requires augmenting an antidepressant with another agent, such as lithium, triiodothyronine (T3 thyroid hormone), and, more recently, second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). Even with the addition of adjuvant agents, only 30% of patients will achieve remission.3 Consequences Risk Factors • symptom severity (odds ratio (OR) = 3.31); Another study found that patients who developed TRD were younger and more likely than patients with no TRD to suffer from fatigue, substance use disorders, anxiety, other psychiatric conditions, insomnia, and pain.8 Patient compliance is also a risk factor since not staying on an antidepressant long enough and skipping doses can hinder the drugs’ effectiveness.9 Patients should be made aware that it may take six to eight weeks to achieve full effects of antidepressants. They should also be made aware that many side effects, such as nausea, constipation, diarrhea, dry mouth, dizziness, and bad taste in the mouth, often improve over time. Pharmacological Treatment of TRD Second-Generation Antipsychotics For TRD, evidence suggests that augmentation with atypical antipsychotics may be appropriate for some patients. However, there are no good head-to-head studies that demonstrate clearcut evidence for the use of one atypical antipsychotic over the other. Also, while antipsychotics may have antidepressant activity, they are not considered appropriate for monotherapy for depression. They should be used as adjuncts to traditional antidepressant medications for persons who fail to respond adequately to an antidepressant alone. Mechanism of Action Studies Quetiapine had the highest risk (NNH = 3), while brexpiprazole was one of the least helpful but had a safer side effect profile with NNH = 19. The NNH for esketamine was 5, while lithium had an NNH of 9. Overall, the risk-to-benefit ratio (NNH/NNT) was much more favorable for lithium, with a ratio = 1.80 compared with ketamine = 0.71 and SGAs = 0.45. Lithium’s favorable risk-to-benefit ratio may come as a surprise to many as the drug is underutilized, likely due to a lack of understanding about lab monitoring needs, safety data, marketing of newer antipsychotic agents by pharmaceutical companies, and the misperception that SGAs are a safer alternative. Of particular value is that lithium offers clear advantages over many other adjuvants due to its ability to reduce suicidal behaviors. In another study of antipsychotics, researchers conducted a Cochrane review of studies with patients with TRD receiving augmenting therapy with SGAs.13 They found that while antipsychotics can be effective, their benefits may be offset by an increased number of people who stop using the medication (dropouts). The most common reason for dropouts was side effects. SGAs’ side effects include weight gain, metabolic dysfunction, extrapyramidal symptoms, and tardive dyskinesia. There are also concerns that augmentation with newer antipsychotics in nonelderly patients with depression may be associated with increased mortality risk.14 The Cochrane review noted that most studies looked at the effects of adding an antipsychotic (cariprazine, quetiapine, ziprasidone, or olanzapine) to current antidepressant treatment. These studies suggest that adding cariprazine results in a small reduction in depressive symptoms, adding quetiapine reduces depressive symptoms, and adding ziprasidone probably results in a small reduction in depressive symptoms. Adding quetiapine to antidepressant therapy reduces symptoms below the remission threshold (NNT = 9). At the same time, the number of people who stop using the medicine (dropouts) increases only at the highest dosage > 200 mg/day. Augmentation with cariprazine or ziprasidone improves the clinical response; however, increased dropouts offset the benefit. While olanzapine may reduce depressive symptoms, its effects on dropping out were uncertain due to there only being one small study for review. Final Considerations — Mark D. Coggins, PharmD, BCGP, FASCP, is vice president of pharmacy services and medication management for skilled nursing centers operated by Diversicare and is a past director on the board of the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists. He was nationally recognized by the Commission for Certification in Geriatric Pharmacy with the 2010 Excellence in Geriatric Pharmacy Practice Award.
References 2. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(11):1905-1917. 3. Halaris A, Sohl E, Whitham EA. Treatment-resistant depression revisited: a glimmer of hope. J Pers Med. 2021;11(2):155. 4. Gaynes B. Assessing the risk factors for difficult-to-treat depression and treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;77 Suppl 1:4-8. 5. Lundberg J, Cars T, Lööv SÅ, et al. Association of treatment-resistant depression with patient outcomes and health care resource utilization in a population-wide study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2023;80(2):167-175. 6. Mrazek DA, Hornberger JC, Altar CA, Degtiar I. A review of the clinical, economic, and societal burden of treatment-resistant depression: 1996-2013. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(8):977-987. 7. Kautzky A, Dold M, Bartova L, et al. Clinical factors predicting treatment resistant depression: affirmative results from the European multicenter study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2019;139(1):78-88. 8. Cepeda, MS, Reps, J, Ryan, P. Finding factors that predict treatment-resistant depression: results of a cohort study. Depress Anxiety. 2018;35:668-673. 9. Souery D, Oswald P, Massat I, et al. Clinical factors associated with treatment resistance in major depressive disorder: results from a European multicenter study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;68:1062-1070. 10. Meltzer HY, Massey BW. The role of serotonin receptors in the action of atypical antipsychotic drugs. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2011;11(1):59-67. 11. Wang P, Si T. Use of antipsychotics in the treatment of depressive disorders. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2013;25(3):134-140. 12. Vázquez GH, Bahji A, Undurraga J, Tondo L, Baldessarini RJ. Efficacy and tolerability of combination treatments for major depression: antidepressants plus second-generation antipsychotics vs. esketamine vs. lithium. J Psychopharmacol. 2021;35(8):890-900. 13. Davies P, Ijaz S, Williams CJ, Kessler D, Lewis G, Wiles N. Pharmacological interventions for treatment-resistant depression in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;12(12):CD010557. 14. Gerhard T, Stroup TS, Correll CU,et al. Mortality risk of antipsychotic augmentation for adult depression. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0239206. |