September/October 2024
September/October 2024 Issue Essential Tremor and Dementia What Clinicians Should Know About the Link Between These Two Conditions Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most common movement disorders, affecting about 7 million people in the United States.1 Long thought to be strictly a motor disorder, it’s now known that the disease has cognitive impacts as well. Among other things, it raises the risk of dementia, at least in certain patients. Here’s what clinicians should know about the connection between ET and dementia—and how to counsel patients about their risk. What Is Essential Tremor? ET is a chronic, progressive, neurologic disease, the most typical feature of which is kinetic tremor during voluntary movements. ET almost always involves the hands or arms, but it also often affects the head/neck, voice, or jaw.2 The tremor is usually somewhat asymmetric, but it can sometimes be severely asymmetric or unilateral. It tends to spread over time, and it also worsens with time, with current best estimates suggesting that it worsens at a rate of 2% to 5% per year.7 About 20% of patients also experience tremor at rest.8 ET can cause significant disability. It frequently affects the ability to carry out basic activities of daily life, such as drinking, writing, pouring, signing one’s name, carrying a cup, and using a spoon.6 It’s also frequently associated with gait and balance impairment.9 Although ET’s most obvious symptoms are motor symptoms, there is also a range of nonmotor symptoms.10 These include sensory effects—namely, diminished hearing and/or diminished sense of smell to a greater degree than in age-matched controls. The disease also has psychiatric symptoms, including depression, apathy, anxiety, and personality characteristics. And ET is linked to cognitive changes ranging from mild to severe. Because of the diversity of clinical manifestations and lack of established biomarkers of the disease, diagnosis can be difficult, and misdiagnosis is common.11-13 While ET is distinct from Parkinson’s disease (PD), ET and PD tend to cooccur, and people with ET have a four-fold higher risk of developing PD than do those without ET.14 Causes and Pathways The mechanisms behind ET still aren’t clear. Originally, the disease was thought to stem from a tremor pacemaker (oscillator) in the inferior olivary nucleus. Later, the theory was expanded to hypothesize a network of multiple oscillators—the inferior olivary nucleus but also the cerebellum, thalamus, and cortex—rather than a single oscillator. This central oscillatory network hypothesis is supported by studies that show a coherence between signals in the aforementioned brain areas and simultaneous signals in muscles affected by tremors.6 A different theory is that ET is a neurodegenerative disease. The main evidence in favor of this theory is that the disease is associated with advanced age, that it worsens in most patients, and that it’s associated with an increased risk of mortality in prospective studies.18,19 The neurodegenerative hypothesis is supported by a variety of studies that demonstrate a large number of degenerative changes in the cerebellum, including but not limited to loss of Purkinje cells in ET.20,21 However, not all studies have replicated the finding of Purkinje cell loss, so this hypothesis is still not universally accepted.22 The Link Between ET and Cognitive Impairment In addition to being associated with mild cognitive deficits, ET has also been linked to a higher risk of both mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. In 2007, a population-based study of older adults in Spain followed participants for an average of 3.8 years and found that 7.8% of participants with ET developed dementia by the end of the follow-up period, compared with only 3.9% of controls.26 In 2009, a separate population-based study of older adults in Manhattan produced roughly similar findings. In this second study—a prospective cohort study with a mean follow-up of 3.8 years—patients with ET were about 60% more likely to develop dementia by the end of the study period compared with controls without ET.27 This year, a new study from researchers at UT Southwestern provided yet further evidence of a link. The new study followed 222 patients with ET (mean age of 79) for an average of five years. At baseline and again at 18-month intervals, each participant was assessed with a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests measuring cognitive function across five different domains. At the conclusion of the study, the researchers found that 27% of the participants had MCI—approximately double the prevalence of MCI seen among similarly-aged adults in the general population. Meanwhile, 19% of participants had dementia—about three times the prevalence seen in the general population.28 Based on this, the researchers concluded that ET appears to triple dementia risk. The new study lacked a contemporary control group and relied instead on historical controls. However, the new study has several major strengths. “It’s a prospective longitudinal study over a 10-year period, which is a far longer period than any of the other studies,” says Elan Louis, MD, MS, a professor and chair of the department of neurology at UT Southwestern Medical Center, and senior author of the new study. A second strength is that the neurological test battery was carefully chosen. “Most neurological tests are designed for the general population. Some require pencil and paper, and ET patients can’t complete them,” says Ludy Shih, MD, clinical director of movement disorders at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, who was not involved in the research. Furthermore, all participants were meticulously evaluated to confirm that their condition met the criteria for ET. This is an important point, Shih says, considering that misdiagnosis with ET is common and could skew the study results. Not only did Louis’s group provide evidence of a strong link between ET, MCI, and dementia, but their new study did something else as well: It analyzed the rate at which participants developed MCI and dementia. Louis’s group showed that each year, approximately 4% of those who had previously showed no cognitive impairment developed MCI, and approximately 12% of those who previously had MCI but not dementia developed dementia.28 “This is the first study to ever quantify dynamically what the dementia looks like,” Louis says. “We have quantified for the first time not only the prevalence of MCI and dementia but the yearly conversion rate to MCI and dementia, to give a sense of at what rate is this evolving.” Importantly, not all studies have found a link between ET and dementia. In 2014, researchers at Banner Sun Health Research Institute in Sun City, Arizona, published findings from a prospective cohort study involving a total of 507 patients (83 with ET and the rest healthy controls), who had been followed for an average of 5.4 years. The researchers found that the incidence of dementia at the end of the study period was 6% for participants with ET and 8% for controls. In this study, then, the participants with ET actually had a lower risk of dementia than that of the controls—although that difference was not statistically significant.29 Why the Inconsistencies Among Studies? That said, even the Banner group has found some link between ET and dementia. In its 2014 study, there was no increased risk of dementia overall for participants with ET, but when the researchers segmented their study population by age of onset of ET, they found that those with ET onset after age 65 had more than double the risk of developing dementia compared with those with onset before age 65.29 This finding regarding the age of onset is consistent with the 2007 Spanish study mentioned previously. The Spanish study showed that ET doubles dementia risk, but in an adjusted model, the researchers found that this was only true for participants who had developed ET after age 65; those who developed ET before the age of 65 had no elevated risk.26 Overall, Shih says, the evidence suggests there’s some link between ET and dementia, but the exact nature of the link is still uncertain. “I think there is probably a nuanced relationship in that certain people with ET are going to be at higher risk. Sometimes studies say, ‘Oh, there’s no link.’ But all the studies say that people who develop ET after age 65 are at higher risk.” One noteworthy point: Dementia risk doesn’t seem linked to either tremor duration or tremor severity. “That would be a logical thing,” Shill says, but both the Banner group and Louis’s group at UT Southwestern have looked into a potential connection, and they “have really not shown a correlation.” Possible Mechanisms “One of the things we have learned from looking at ET brains over the last 20 years is that there is clear evidence of cerebellar dysfunction,” Louis says. “Cerebellar dysfunction is associated with cognitive-affective syndrome. So, it’s highly likely that some of the mild cognitive difficulties in ET simply relate to the fact that the cerebellum is not normal. It’s degenerating.” The more pressing question, however, is what causes moderate and severe cognitive disturbances, especially dementia. Recent postmortem studies have found that the brains of ET patients show evidence of greater-than-normal tau pathology.30 Changes in tau protein have been linked to a variety of neurodegenerative disorders, including AD, raising the question of whether there are shared mechanisms behind ET and Alzheimer’s. Putting these two points together, then, it’s likely that two distinct mechanisms lie behind the milder vs more severe cognitive impacts seen in ET. “The cerebellar degeneration, which is at the root of ET, is responsible for some of the milder cognitive problems, and the increased risk for comorbid neurodegenerative disease is responsible for some portion—maybe a large portion—of the severe cognitive disturbances, like dementia,” Louis says. Takeaways for Clinicians 1. Don’t sweep cognitive complaints from ET patients under the rug. According to Louis, patients with ET who complain of cognitive difficulties are sometimes just told, “Well, you’re old. It’s just because you’re old.” But current research makes plain that cognitive impairments are common in ET, and doctors should take complaints about cognition seriously, he says. 2. Talk to ET patients about the potential for future cognitive impairment and dementia. Because her own research has found evidence of a link between ET and dementia only in patients with ET onset after 65, Shill herself remains uncertain whether all patients with ET are at elevated dementia risk. Still, she says, the topic is likely to come up with patients, and clinicians should be prepared to address it. “Patients are smart,” Shill says. They are likely reading about research on this topic, and they want to know, “‘I’ve got a tremor now, but what about five years from now? Am I going to get Parkinson’s? Am I going to get dementia?’” She doesn’t believe in worrying patients unnecessarily, but she does discuss the subject candidly and tells her patients, “‘We’re going to keep an eye on you. I’m going to ask you about cognitive changes. And if you’re worried about something, we will do additional testing and formal cognitive assessments if needed.’” According to Louis, conversations about the potential for cognitive impairment and dementia are important because they allow patients to better prepare for their own future. “Doctors need to be aware [of the potential for cognitive impairment], screening for it, advising patients of what their risks might be so that they can plan for it.” 3. Talk to ET patients who don’t yet show cognitive impairments about how to protect their brains. “Practically speaking, any patient I’m seeing in my clinic, especially if they are in midlife—mid-40s, 50s, and above—I’m always counseling; you have to protect your brain,” Shih says. “Think about all the evidence base of what protects you from dementia—a healthy diet, exercise, getting hearing impairment addressed.” Counseling on protecting brain health is important for all patients, but it may be especially important for those with ET. Looking Ahead The identification of blood-based biomarkers that could help diagnose and categorize ET patients with MCI and dementia would be a major help, as such biomarkers would help researchers better understand what is happening in the brain in ET. Again, several studies have shown evidence of AD pathology (or AD-like pathology) in the brains of ET patients. “It could be in a couple of years that a patient could walk into a doctor’s office complaining of cognitive impairment, and with a simple blood test, we can diagnose them with Alzheimer’s disease or provide information about what their risk is for developing Alzheimer’s.” If future research continues to show a link between ET and AD, there’s a possibility that new immunotherapies rolling out for people with AD might be beneficial for ET patients—a truly encouraging prospect. Fortunately, according to Louis, researchers are actively investigating all of these points, and there’s likely to be a lot of new data within two to three years. “Things are moving quickly,” Louis says. “It’s an exciting time.” — Jamie Santa Cruz is a health and medical writer based in Parker, Colorado.
References 2. Clark LN, Louis ED. Essential tremor. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;147:229-239. 3. Louis ED, Factor-Litvak P. Screening for and estimating the prevalence of essential tremor: a random-digit dialing-based study in the New York metropolitan area. Neuroepidemiology. 2016;46(1):51-56. 4. Louis ED, McCreary M. How common is essential tremor? Update on the worldwide prevalence of essential tremor. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2021;11:28. 5. Song P, Zhang Y, Zha M, et al. The global prevalence of essential tremor, with emphasis on age and sex: a meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2021;11:04028. 6. Okelberry T, Lyons KE, Pahwa R. Updates in essential tremor. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2024;122:106086. 7. Louis ED, Agnew A, Gillman A, Gerbin M, Viner AS. Estimating annual rate of decline: prospective, longitudinal data on arm tremor severity in two groups of essential tremor cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82(7):761-765. 8. Cohen O, Pullman S, Jurewicz E, Watner D, Louis ED. Rest tremor in patients with essential tremor: prevalence, clinical correlates, and electrophysiologic characteristics. Arch Neurol. 2003;60(3):405-410. 9. Rao AK, Louis ED. Ataxic gait in essential tremor: a disease-associated feature? Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2019;9:10.7916/d8-28jq-8t52. 10. Louis ED. Non-motor symptoms in essential tremor: a review of the current data and state of the field. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;22 Suppl 1(0 1):S115-S118. 11. Jain S, Lo SE, Louis ED. Common misdiagnosis of a common neurological disorder: how are we misdiagnosing essential tremor? Arch Neurol. 2006;63(8):1100-1104. 12. Schrag A, Münchau A, Bhatia K, Quinn N, Marsden C. Essential tremor: an overdiagnosed condition? J Neurol. 2000;247:955-959. 13. Gao Y, Ding L, Liu J, Wang X, Meng Q. Exploring the diagnostic markers of essential tremor: a study based on machine learning algorithms. Open Life Sci. 2023;18(1):20220622. 14. Benito-León J, Louis ED, Bermejo-Pareja F; Neurological Disorders in Central Spain Study Group. Risk of incident Parkinson's disease and parkinsonism in essential tremor: a population based study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80(4):423-425. 15. Wagle Shukla A. Diagnosis and treatment of essential tremor. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2022;28(5):1333-1349. 16. Louis ED, Ford B, Frucht S, Barnes LF, X-Tang M, Ottman R. Risk of tremor and impairment from tremor in relatives of patients with essential tremor: a community-based family study. Ann Neurol. 2001;49(6):761-769. 17. Lorenz D, Frederiksen H, Moises H, Kopper F, Deuschl G, Christensen K. High concordance for essential tremor in monozygotic twins of old age. Neurology. 2004;62(2):208-211. 18. Kosmowska B, Wardas J. The pathophysiology and treatment of essential tremor: the role of adenosine and dopamine receptors in animal models. Biomolecules. 2021;11(12):1813. 19. Louis ED. Essential tremors: a family of neurodegenerative disorders?. Arch Neurol. 2009;66(10):1202-1208. 20. Holtbernd F, Shah NJ. Imaging the pathophysiology of essential tremor—a systematic review. Front Neurol. 2021;12. 21. Louis ED, Martuscello RT, Gionco JT, et al. Histopathology of the cerebellar cortex in essential tremor and other neurodegenerative motor disorders: comparative analysis of 320 brains. Acta Neuropathol. 2023;145(3):265-283. 22. Symanski C, Shill HA, Dugger B, et al. Essential tremor is not associated with cerebellar Purkinje cell loss. Mov Disord. 2014;29(4):496-500. 23. Sengul Y, Sengul HS, Yucekaya SK, et al. Cognitive functions, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances: assessment of nonmotor features in young patients with essential tremor. Acta Neurol Belg. 2015;115(3):281-287. 24. Benito-León J, Louis ED, Sánchez-Ferro Á, Bermejo-Pareja F. Rate of cognitive decline during the premotor phase of essential tremor: a prospective study. Neurology. 2013;81(1):60-66. 25. Janicki SC, Cosentino S, Louis ED. The cognitive side of essential tremor: what are the therapeutic implications?. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2013;6(6):353-368. 26. Bermejo-Pareja F, Louis ED, Benito-León J; Neurological Disorders in Central Spain (NEDICES) Study Group. Risk of incident dementia in essential tremor: a population-based study. Mov Disord. 2007;22(11):1573-1580. 27. Thawani SP, Schupf N, Louis ED. Essential tremor is associated with dementia: prospective population-based study in New York. Neurology. 2009;73(8):621-625. 28. Ghanem A, Berry DS, Burkes A, et al. Prevalence of and annual conversion rates to mild cognitive impairment and dementia: prospective, longitudinal study of an essential tremor cohort. Ann Neurol. 2024;95(6):1193-1204. 29. Shill HA, Hentz JG, Jacobson SA, et al. Essential tremor in the elderly and risk for dementia. J Neurodegener Dis. 2014;2014:328765. 30. Farrell K, Cosentino S, Iida MA, et al. Quantitative assessment of pathological tau burden in essential tremor: a postmortem study. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2019;78(1):31-37. |